On June 30th of this year, it was the 25rd anniversary of the feature film release of Judge Dredd.
Did you notice? Probably not.
Even if you’re a die-hard fan of 2000AD’s lawman, odds are you wouldn’t have cared simply because the first film with him was a bit of a stinker. When I originally saw it at the cinema I hoped for something special.
Instead, I felt ripped off. To be fair I still watched Judge Dredd a few more times, desperately hoping that it would improve with repeated viewings.
It didn’t.
I left it alone for quite a while after that, and it didn’t even have the guilty pleasure factor for me that other bad movies like Street Fighter have.
I haven’t seen Judge Dredd in years… Until now.
The story is pretty simple.
Judge Dredd, played by Sylvester Stallone, is the satirical fascist lawman of the future, and all he wants to do is his job. But when his evil clone brother Rico escapes from jail and frames Dredd for a murder he didn’t commit, Dredd is found guilty and sent to a penal colony. Not that he makes it there, of course. His ship crash-lands in the Cursed Earth, the irradiated wasteland outside of Mega-City One.
After battling the Angel gang (including Mean Machine), Dredd makes his way back to the Big Meg to take down Rico and the corrupt Chief Judge Griffin. The villains’ plan? To bring a new totalitarian order to the city by unleashing an army of clone Judges. With Dredd struggling to understand how the law could have failed so badly, can he save the day?
That sounds pretty good on the surface, as far as plots go.
The strange thing is that Judge Dredd starts out pretty well, if you can get past the ridiculous armour and codpiece that the Judges wear. Dredd himself starts out in great form, wiping out perps in a block war and dispensing summary justice in a tongue-in-cheek fashion that’s pretty close to the comics. Also, Mega-City One looks good, resembling the world of Blade Runner to some extent.
Then it all goes wrong.
Almost on cue with Dredd taking his helmet off (something readers know he doesn’t do!) the whole story goes off the rails. Fans want to see Dredd being, well, a Judge. Instead, they strip him of the costume and helmet, and instead of dispensing justice he’s just a typical action movie guy on a quest to beat the bad guy. Oh, and he’s given a “funny” sidekick.
Appearances by Mean Machine and Hammerstein (from the ABC Warriors) brighten up otherwise dull moments, while Armand Assante as Rico is inspired, but the whole thing feels flat.
As for Stallone’s performance in Judge Dredd, it’s almost embarrassing as he tries to deadpan some lines and attempts to emote. He even smiles a little after Judge Hershey kisses him. It’s everything the fans never wanted. Oh, and the violence is of a PG-13 level so it’s mostly harmless.
Logically, it’s never quite made clear just what Rico gets out of causing mayhem for Griffin. He’s chaos incarnate, similar to the Joker, and he’s happy to help tear the city apart. But since Griffin’s goal is to create ultimate order, their goals seem so incompatible that it’s little surprise Rico turns on the Chief Judge. The mystery is why Griffin never saw it coming.
This really could have been a good film if only it had been a Judge Dredd movie. Stallone himself described it as a missed opportunity and you can see his point. It really did have potential, which apparently he squashed at the time by not letting the director tell a story which the fans wanted. At times – especially early on – you can see how good it could have been but it doesn’t last.
It’s been 25 years since this came out, and time hasn’t improved Judge Dredd in any way.
I actually quite liked the 95 version and the 2012 version. Yeah the 95 one is quite campy, but still was a fun watch to me.
well, I actually came in a search to see why a second was never made and why it got a crappy reboot instead? your opinion is your own and is the exact opposite of my own. I became an artist because of guys like Wagner/Ezquerra, Mobius, Bilal, Corben and Wrightston. I am also a major fan of ABC warriors and though the movie had problems (mostly Reiner imo) – but he was popular at the time is why he got in the role like Sly and most likely why the script had something in that goofy nature in the script. what movie doesn’t have forced issues like this? what was liked at that time versus popularity of certain actors and available directors and writers, backers etc… to get the damn thing made and asses in seats then there will always be compromises that have to be made to stroke every numbnuts egos that have an inkling of say. not one comic adaptation has ever done justice to the comics ever. but I digress, I still love this flick and it will forever hold a place on my hardrive collection. I am actually watching “the boys” right now and saw carl urban and it and made me think of Dredd. Anyways, to each their own decent article btw.